Accessibility TestingChrome Toolkit
Toolkit vs Web App
When to use the Chrome Toolkit and when to use the Website Scanner in the web app.
Toolkit vs Web App
Both use the same axe-core engine and push results to the same workspace. They differ in what they can reach and what they can do.
Quick comparison
| Capability | Chrome Toolkit | Web App (Website Scanner) |
|---|---|---|
| Pages per report | Multiple — accumulated as you navigate | Up to 10 URLs submitted up front |
| Authenticated scanning | Uses your current browser session | Configurable: cookies / login form / HTTP headers |
| Multi-page workflow capture | ✅ yes — detects navigation and rolls up results | Via the server-side Workflow Analyzer |
| WCAG version / rule pack configuration | Uses workspace defaults | Per-scan |
| Element inspection | Native Chrome DevTools | Page snapshot viewer |
| Report export (PDF report / CSV summary) | In the web app | In the web app |
| Team sharing | In-panel or the web app | In the web app |
| Best for… | Walking real user flows during development | Batch audits, compliance reports |
Pick the toolkit when…
- You want to walk through a real user flow and collect issues from every page in one pass.
- You want to scan pages behind a login you're already signed into, without configuring separate auth.
- You want to inspect a failing element with the native Chrome picker, not a snapshot.
Pick the web app when…
- You have a fixed list of URLs to audit and want to submit them all at once.
- You need configurable authentication (cookies / login form / headers) for scans that run without you driving the browser.
- You need formal WCAG conformance reporting and report exports.
- You want the full report and export experience in one place.
Can I use both?
Yes — they share the same workspace. A common pattern is:
- Use the toolkit during development to catch issues as you code.
- Use the web app in CI or for periodic audits to produce shareable reports against a bigger URL list.
